On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 06:54:16PM -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote: > Quoting Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > Patrick Welche <prlw1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > so the -R made it, and all is well :-) > > > > > > I can't check the opposite though: do systems that don't want rpath get > > > one now? > > > > Yes, they probably do. Perhaps the libtool guys can chime in on > > whether the patch was a good idea. > > (Not a libtool developer.) > > This looks suspiciously like the -rpath that's been hosing me when I try to link > with a libGL outside the X11 directories (specifically, Mesa built in my home > directory). How did you guess? I am trying to build gtk+ and find that dependencies and rpaths are missing. PATH_XTRA was one. A LDADDS in one of the gtk+ Makefile.ams is the other problem - LDADDS although set correctly isn't used anywhere - the author probably thought it was the equivalent to AM_LDFLAGS, but that is for another list... Cheers, Patrick _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
