Quoting Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > Patrick Welche <prlw1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > so the -R made it, and all is well :-) > > > > I can't check the opposite though: do systems that don't want rpath get > > one now? > > Yes, they probably do. Perhaps the libtool guys can chime in on > whether the patch was a good idea. (Not a libtool developer.) This looks suspiciously like the -rpath that's been hosing me when I try to link with a libGL outside the X11 directories (specifically, Mesa built in my home directory). -- Braden McDaniel e-mail: <braden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://endoframe.com> Jabber: <braden@xxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
