Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: <autoconf@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99
From: Ralph Schleicher <rs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 01 Jan 2005 20:09:04 +0100
Cc: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <87k6qx35jo.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu>
Organization: Development Proletcult Cadre #23
References: <A59219BDE952BC4D9525E69555164DBC1A4037@newman.partech.com> <87wtv1yqsu.fsf@whinlatter.whinlatter.ukfsn.org> <87k6qx35jo.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu>
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3

Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> "ISO" is not an acronym

International Standard Organization

-- 
Ralph


_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@xxxxxxx
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99
  - From: Andreas Schwab

References:
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99
  - From: Dan Manthey
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99
  - From: Roger Leigh
- Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99
  - From: Paul Eggert

Prev by Date: Re: Last configure args
Next by Date: Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99
Previous by thread: Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99
Next by thread: Re: AC_PROG_CC_C99
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [GCC Help] [Kernel Discussion] [RPM Discussion] [Red Hat Development] [Yosemite News] [Linux USB] [Samba]

Powered by Linux