Warren Young <warren@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Paul Eggert wrote: >> What versions, exactly? > > Autoconf-2.59 > Automake-1.8b I don't recommend 1.8b; they should be running a released version of automake. Preferably 1.9.1; or 1.8.5 if they're more conservative. However, this shouldn't matter here: I ran "autoconf" without running "automake", and autoconf doesn't depend on automake. > Libtool-1.5 1.5.8 would be better, but (like automake) it shouldn't matter for this test case. >> m4 1.4.1 > > I'm not certain that they have GNU m4 installed. They may be using > the system m4. That wouldn't work at all. >> Looks like a botched autoconf installation to me. Your correspondent >> might try running "truss -f" and seeing what file is missing. > > I'll have him try that. I take it that program works like strace on Linux? Yes. _______________________________________________ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@xxxxxxx http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
