Re: 1.x for vms maintainership request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> let me know what you think.  lack of write privs is no big loss to me
> personally (i would publish and point users to autoconf 1.11-ttn1 for
> vms instead of 1.12), but it certainly seems to make things easier for
> others to accept.

1.11 was a long time ago (1994, wow!) and personally I'd rather not be
distracted by any problems in supporting it.  So I'd prefer that you
generate your own 1.11-ttn1 version.



[Index of Archives]     [GCC Help]     [Kernel Discussion]     [RPM Discussion]     [Red Hat Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux USB]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux