On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Kidwell,jr, Jack wrote:
Seth,
Thank you for patiently seeing this through. I'm the guy with the
yum-unfriendly COTS RPM. The vendor saw the light and fixed their RPM,
so it's yummy!
glad to hear it - I'm still just a little bit curious how they were building
it before, though.
Mmmh, a package without sourcerpm tag rings a certain jRPM bell in my
head. OTOH rpm should notice its missing and fake it if it otherwise looks
like a binary package, but how exactly all this works depends on rpm
version.
- Panu -
_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum
