On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Joshua Burns wrote:
Does YUM (or portions of YUM) have to be re-built, or does this only require rebuilding the RPM binaries/shared objects, etc. ?
only rpm.
-sv
--- On Fri, 11/13/09, Seth Vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Seth Vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
To: "Yellowdog Updater, Modified" <yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, November 13, 2009, 12:52 PM
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Joshua Burns wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The RPM version is 4.4.2.3 - I selected it primarily because it matches the version that is distributed with RHEL 5.x (we
> are using the standard vendor-supplied RPM with Linux). Not really sure about patch level of RPM itself - I got the
> source from a tape archive directly from the development site. Is there a way I can tell by looking at the source files?
>
> Below is a capture of the truss(1) output from yum (first), then rpm(second).
>
okay - then you're missing a bunch of patches most likely.
Grab the srpm from rhel5.4 for rpm and check out all the patches that are applied.
Try those out on your solaris build - tell me if any of them make the difference. I SWEAR I remember this problem affecting
something else.
-sv
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum
_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum
