Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Does YUM (or portions of YUM) have to be re-built, or does this only require rebuilding the RPM binaries/shared objects, etc. ?

--- On Fri, 11/13/09, Seth Vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Seth Vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
To: "Yellowdog Updater, Modified" <yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, November 13, 2009, 12:52 PM



On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Joshua Burns wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The RPM version is 4.4.2.3 - I selected it primarily because it matches the version that is distributed with RHEL 5.x (we
> are using the standard vendor-supplied RPM with Linux). Not really sure about patch level of RPM itself - I got the
> source from a tape archive directly from the  development site. Is there a way I can tell by looking at the source files?
>
> Below is a capture of the truss(1) output from yum (first), then rpm(second).
>

okay - then you're missing a bunch of patches most likely.

Grab the srpm from rhel5.4 for rpm and check out all the patches that are applied.

Try those out on your solaris build - tell me if any of them make the difference. I SWEAR I remember this problem affecting something else.

-sv

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum

_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux