OK, can that question - seems pointing fedora.repo to file:///media/Fedora%2010%20i386%20DVD/ is not a good idea. Doing a yum install on the difference between what was installed and is now installed by way of rpm is progressing well. Thanks. Regards, M. 2009/1/7 Morgan Read <mstuff@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi Folks > > My issue no doubt relates to my methodology... > > I've just moved from f8 to f10. Figured that I'd take a list of all > my installed RPMs and update to my that list once I'd installed f10 to > return to my previous state - more or less. > > man yum says for yum update "... If no package matches the given > package name(s), they are assumed to be a shell glob and any matches > are then installed." So, I've assumed that with that command what > isn't installed from my list will be installed and what isn't up to > date will be updated. But, that command seems only to tell me: > No Match for argument: a52dec > Package(s) a52dec available, but not installed. > etc > etc > And, not install anything... See here: http://www.read.org.nz/YumUpdateFail.txt > > yum install seems more hopeful, with the same package being marked for > an "update" (by "install"?): > ... > ---> Package a52dec.i386 0:0.7.4-13.fc10 set to be updated > ... > But, then failing for missing dependencies... See here (after yum > clean all & yum makecache): http://www.read.org.nz/YumInstallFail.txt > > So, any suggestions would be much appreciated. > > Regards, > Morgan. > _______________________________________________ Yum mailing list Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum
