Re: Comparison between update tools

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Timms wrote:
Giap Phan Vu wrote:
I'm making compare between YUM, APT-RPM and Smart update tools but I
really do not know what is the strongest, the weakness of these
tools.

The target platform is CentOS (or Wind River)

I like yum {haven't used apt-rpm, smart for some time} because it's
extensible nature allows a config that does what I wan't {skip-broken,
download-only, version lock (good for eg machines running vmware where a
kernel update stops stuff working)}

For me the main advantages of yum over smart (which can also handle yum repositories) is that : - yum is the official package manager for RHEL, meaning that I can download packages from RHN (with yum-rhn-plugin activated) via command line script. - yum (yum-utils, actually) has yumdownloader, reposync, and repotrack, which is handy if you want to create local repository mirrors. Especially useful if you have lots of servers and want to save bandwitdth. - yum-utils has yum-priorities plugin, which is important because in our setup we need to replace some upstream packages. yum-priorities make sure packages in our local repository doesn't get overwritten by other sources. It can also be used the other way around, to make sure that RHEL/Centos RPMs doesn't get overwritten by packages from third-party repositories.

apt-rpm (and synaptic) is another beast altogather, and not all RHEL/Centos repositories support downloading with apt.

Regards,

Fajar

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Yum mailing list
Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux