yes please. it looks suspiciously like a yum issue, and if it is, it would be nice to have the yum development team investigate and fix it. On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 10:16 +0200, Frank wrote: > 2007/7/3, Frank <fluedke@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > Problem is, that my yum is failing when doing bigger things. Bigger means, > > that a "yum install xxx" or "yum uninstall yyy" is working as long as there are > > no bigger dependencies. When doing something bigger I get an error message > > like the following: > > Resolving Dependencies > > --> Running transaction check > > ---> Package firstboot-tui.noarch 0:1.4.35-1.fc7 set to be updated > > ---> Package krb5-workstation.i386 0:1.6.1-2.1.fc7 set to be updated > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File "/usr/bin/yum", line 29, in <module> > > yummain.main(sys.argv[1:]) > > File "/usr/share/yum-cli/yummain.py", line 135, in main > > (result, resultmsgs) = base.buildTransaction() > > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 527, > > in buildTransaction > > (rescode, restring) = self.resolveDeps() > > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/depsolve.py", line 804, > > in resolveDeps > > deps = self._mytsCheck() > > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/depsolve.py", line 774, > > in _mytsCheck > > thisneeds = self._checkInstall(txmbr) > > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/depsolve.py", line 948, > > in _checkInstall > > dep = self._provideToPkg(req) > > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/depsolve.py", line 697, > > in _provideToPkg > > for pkgtup in self.rpmdb.whatProvides(r, f, v): > > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/rpmsack.py", line 386, in > > whatProvides > > pkgs = self.searchProvides(name) > > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/rpmsack.py", line 145, in > > searchProvides > > return self.searchPrco(name, 'provides') > > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/rpmsack.py", line 127, in > > searchPrco > > if not result.has_key(po.pkgid): > > TypeError: list objects are unhashable > > ###### > > Several people told me that this is more a yum issue than a Fedora > issue. Should I open a bug report for this? > > Cheers > Frank > _______________________________________________ > Yum mailing list > Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Telkom SA Limited e-mail legal notice available at http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _______________________________________________ Yum mailing list Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum
