[Yum] Re: relationship between up2date and yum repos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 08:20:43PM -0400, seth vidal alleged:
> On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 11:09 -0700, Garrick Staples wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:41:35PM -0400, Steven Stromer alleged:
> > > I was really hoping to hear more about how others manage the crossover 
> > > that occurs between packages in Fedora's repos and other repos. If you 
> > > or anyone else has comments on this, please post. I understand that for 
> > 
> > I disable all "non official" repos, leaving main, extras, updates, and
> > livna.  Then I use '--enablerepo=*' when querying for something I want.
> > 
> > If I find something from a 3rd party repo, I enable that repo but keep
> > it limited with an explicit "includepkgs" with only those packages I
> > want.  And if I'm feeling pedantic, I exclude those packages from the
> > official repos.
> > 
> > For example, my girlfriend's FC4 desktop doesn't get anything from dag,
> > atrpms, etc.  But my FC4 laptop includes ipw2100 from atrpms.
> > 
> 
> just as a fyi - you can get ipw2100, etc from livna, too.

I don't recall why I tool ipw2100 from atrpms.  Maybe the livna packages
weren't available yet at the time.

But that's besides the point, I was just offering an example.

-- 
Garrick Staples, Linux/HPCC Administrator
University of Southern California
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/yum/attachments/20050908/8890359e/attachment.bin

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux