>From /usr/lib/rpm/rpmrc: arch_compat: x86_64: amd64 athlon noarch arch_compat: amd64: x86_64 athlon noarch arch_compat: ia32e: x86_64 athlon noarch Doesn't this effectively say that amd64 and x86_64 should play together? Joshua On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:43:44PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > I've attached a -d5 output from this command. hprsm.amd64 is inside the > > cisco-linux-server/x86_64 repo primary.xml.gz, yet nothing is output. > > > > > amd64 should be a supported arch for yum 2.2.X and 2.3.X > > > > > > I don't see em64t anywhere - is it possible for you to make this package > > > available to me? > > > > http://h18000.www1.hp.com/support/files/server/us/download/22430.html > > > > The above URL has HP's amd64 and em64t RPMs for "hprsm". > > Well it seems like hp has modified their rpmrc b/c rpm in rhel3 has no > knowledge of that arch. > > which makes this all extremely painful. > > Might want to ask them where the it came from b/c making up new arches > is kinda a no-no. > > about the amd64 arch: > what does the machine report as? > run this command: > python -c "import rpmUtils.arch; print rpmUtils.arch.getBaseArch()" > > and run: > cat /etc/rpm/platform > > if it isn't reporting as 'amd64' then it is not compatible with amd64 > packages. > > ia32e is intel's x86_64 > amd64 is amd's x86_64 > they are both supersets of x86_64 iirc and you can't use ia32e packages > on just any-old x86_64 and not on amd64. > > fun, huh? > > -sv > > > _______________________________________________ > Yum mailing list > Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum -- Joshua Jensen joshua@xxxxxxxx "If God didn't want us to eat animals, why did he make them out of meat?"
