On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 10:47:20PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > There is/was nothing broken at ATrpms. Being trigger-happy doesn't > > make you look smart. > > Uh, I wasn't making a comment about you, Commenting on my work is commenting on me. > so please refrain from making comments about me--we aren't pals > enough for such things. Indeed, and that should work in both directions, right? So let me ask you to investigate before make false statements. Thanks. > I was saying that when it's impossible for yum to figure out > dependency issues (a situation commonly arising from broken > repositories, of which there are plenty, especially when mixed and > matched), trying to program in some fuzzy logic to acommodate for > configuration and/or repository error will result in fuzzy systems. Yes, nicely worded FUD and still completely unrelated to the issue, still implying that there is a "configuration and/or repository error". There is/was no broken repo/configuration involved in this. Period. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-January/msg01826.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=144376 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=140832 https://devel.linux.duke.edu/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=378 https://devel.linux.duke.edu/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=379 http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=288 http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=289 -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/yum/attachments/20050404/e1f92704/attachment-0001.bin
