Excellent! This is something we too are looking at doing for controlled updates from a channel... errr, "repo" :-) Disabling all the repo entries by default seems like one obvious way of doing this. It would also be nice to do something like this: --disablerepo * --enablerepo <single repo name> Essentially I want to automate updates from a single repo. Will that kind of "disable all then enable one" syntax ever been in the cards? Joshua On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 11:50:45PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > looks like it's just a bug. > > a pretty silly one, too. > > I'll get it fixed in 2.2.1, thanks. > > -sv > > > _______________________________________________ > Yum mailing list > Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum -- Joshua Jensen joshua@xxxxxxxx "If God didn't want us to eat animals, why did he make them out of meat?"
