On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 14:00 +0000, Cormac J. Gebruers wrote: > > > > But it's yum 2.1.X? > > -sv > > Yup, 2.1.12 > okay - same situation applies then - I was speaking of fc3 b/c that's how most people are using yum 2.1.x. cool. thanks, -sv
On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 14:00 +0000, Cormac J. Gebruers wrote: > > > > But it's yum 2.1.X? > > -sv > > Yup, 2.1.12 > okay - same situation applies then - I was speaking of fc3 b/c that's how most people are using yum 2.1.x. cool. thanks, -sv