On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 10:56 +0200, Matthias Saou wrote: > Hi, > > I just tried upgrading my Fedora Core Development machine today, and got > this : > > [...] > [u] xorg-x11-twm.i386 0:6.7.99.903-2 - user > [u] xorg-x11-xauth.i386 0:6.7.99.903-2 - user > [u] xorg-x11-xfs.i386 0:6.7.99.903-2 - user > [u] yelp.i386 0:2.6.2-1 - user > Is this ok [y/N]: y > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/share/yum/yummain.py", line 135, in ? > main(sys.argv[1:]) > File "/usr/share/yum/yummain.py", line 118, in main > base.doTransaction() > File "/usr/share/yum/cli.py", line 418, in doTransaction > problems = self.sigCheckPkgs(downloadpkgs) > File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 238, in > sigCheckPkgs > result = rpmUtils.miscutils.checkSig(self.read_ts, po.localPkg()) > File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/rpmUtils/miscutils.py", line 82, > in checkSig > os.close(fdno) > OSError: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor > > I had "gpgcheck=1" in the [main] section of my yum.conf, leftover from some > testing I made a while back. IIRC yum 2.0 simply ignored it, and it had to > be added under each repository entry individually. Removing that line fixed > the problem, possibly as I don't have any other gpgcheck=1 lines in the > file (if sig checking is plain broken). > The above bug is fixed in cvs - but it will only ever be encountered on a damaged package, not on a gpg-unsigned one. -sv
