On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 12:59 +0000, Michael A. Peters wrote: > On 11/18/2004 03:48:44 AM, Nigel Metheringham wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 11:36 +0000, Michael A. Peters wrote: > > > How do I get around this and make it easier for users to update B > > with > > > A without needing to accept other updates from my repo? > > > > yum install package A > > That didn't delete package B (at least not from the rpm database) - > even though it should have conflicted. > > Wonder if that FC3T3 rpm bug, er, feature, that allowed installation of > packages overwriting files of others is back in rpm for FC3 ... No, It's a different bug and I know what's causing it. Go ahead and file in bugzilla. I'm aware of the problem and I'll solve it before long. Sorry -sv
