On Sat, 15 May 2004, Robert G. Brown wrote: > Obviously after FC1, which we're still using in production on our > Opterons. Maybe the solution is just to wait for FC2? This naming > scheme would work fine, especially if there were a package group named > something pithy like Compat_i386 that had all the package.i386 libraries > in it. To run "arbitrary" i386 programs, unfortunately one needs a > nearly complete twinning of the x86_64 libraries including e.g. GSL, > libm, and others. This is assuming that the system would indeed barf if > handed i386 code that called mixed libraries further downstream than > just glibc. It'd still like to see a usable mozilla on FC2-x86_64. Missing gtk libraries and all that dont help. -Dan
