I got the same behavior--everything looks good after the patch. Thanks! -lars >From seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 12:45:48PM -0400: > > > Note how it found and downloaded headers for i586 pachages that it had > > completely ignored before. > > > > So far I haven't seen any unpleasant side effects. Is there anything > > specific I should try? "yum update" doesn't offer to update anything > > out of the ordinary. > > No, I don't see anything that should obviously break, but I like to be > careful. The arch stuff gets twisty, quickly. > > -sv > > > _______________________________________________ > Yum mailing list > Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum -- lars damerow button pusher pixar animation studios lars@xxxxxxxxx four, five, therefore nine; nine and nine, therefore eighteen. eighteen and eighteen, therefore thirty-six; four, five, therefore nine..
