On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 01:46:34AM -0400, seth vidal alleged: > > > Any suggestions on what I can do? > > > > If I can't solve this, I'll just have to build the packages with version > > strings in the module filename and hardlink them to the real name in %post. > > > > Funny thing about this problem, I can't figure out how to test it using 'rpm' > > directly. The way deps work out, both the user-space and the kernel module > > packages need to be installed in the same transaction... but how do you update > > one package and install the second at the same time with 'rpm'? > > to my knowledge, you don't. However, if you want to test this out it's > not too hard to setup a transaction set in python, so you could test > each result. Is this a librpm issue or a yum issue? It sounds to me like a librpm issue, but without python knowledge, I don't know how to demostrate the problem to rpm people. -- Garrick Staples, Linux/HPCC Administrator University of Southern California -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/yum/attachments/20040727/32dc1e6e/attachment.bin
