[Yum] confusion with installing 3rd party kernel modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 08:36:05PM -0700, Garrick Staples alleged:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've packaged several kernel modules for my kernels.  Each rpm provides
> "kernel-modules" so that yum will tag them as install-only.  But I'm getting a
> strange behaviour when trying to update them.  Notice the different commands I
> ran, and the different results.  Why does the second case work fine and the
> first one doesn't?

Something very strange is going on here.  In the examples below, ibmasm, gm,
and pvfs are all 3rd party modules that I'm packaging in the exact same way.  

Note that it errors on both gm-smp and pvfs-smp, but why not ibmasm?...

[root@hpcjr001 root]# yum update
[..snip..]
I will do the following:
[install: ibmasm-smp 1:2.02-2.4.21.15.0.3.EL.2usc.19usc.i686]
[install: gm-smp 1:2.0.12.20040520-2.4.21.15.0.3.EL.2usc.23usc.i686]
[install: pvfs-smp 1:1.6.3-0pre2.2.4.21.15.0.3.EL.2usc.2usc.i686]
[update: ibmasm 1:2.02-2.4.21.15.0.3.EL.2usc.19usc.i386]
[update: pvfs 1:1.6.3-0pre2.2.4.21.15.0.3.EL.2usc.2usc.i386]
[update: gm 1:2.0.12.20040520-2.4.21.15.0.3.EL.2usc.23usc.i686]
Is this ok [y/N]: y   
[..snip..]
Running test transaction:
Errors reported doing trial run
file /lib/modules/2.4.21-15.0.3.EL.2uscsmp/gm/gm.o from install of gm-smp-2.0.12.20040520-2.4.21.15.0.3.EL.2usc.23usc conflicts with file from package gm-smp-2.0.12.20040520-2.4.21.15.0.3.EL.2usc.22usc
file /lib/modules/2.4.21-15.0.3.EL.2uscsmp/kernel/fs/pvfs/pvfs.o from install of pvfs-smp-1.6.3-0pre2.2.4.21.15.0.3.EL.2usc.2usc conflicts with file from package pvfs-smp-1.6.3-0pre1.2.4.21.15.0.3.EL.2usc.20usc
file /lib/modules/2.4.21-15.0.3.EL.2uscsmp/kernel/fs/pvfs/pvfs.o from install of pvfs-smp-1.6.3-0pre2.2.4.21.15.0.3.EL.2usc.2usc conflicts with file from package pvfs-smp-1.6.3-0pre1.2.4.21.15.0.3.EL.2usc.21usc


As I showed last night, 'yum update pvfs-smp' works fine, I'll save you the
long copy/paste that is basicly the same.

But now gm-smp updates fine without being specifically mentioned..


[root@hpcjr001 root]# yum update
[..snip..]
I will do the following:
[install: ibmasm-smp 1:2.02-2.4.21.15.0.3.EL.2usc.19usc.i686]
[install: gm-smp 1:2.0.12.20040520-2.4.21.15.0.3.EL.2usc.23usc.i686]
[update: ibmasm 1:2.02-2.4.21.15.0.3.EL.2usc.19usc.i386]
[update: gm 1:2.0.12.20040520-2.4.21.15.0.3.EL.2usc.23usc.i686]
Is this ok [y/N]: y   
Downloading Packages  
Running test transaction:
Test transaction complete, Success!
gm 100 % done 1/6     
ibmasm 100 % done 2/6 
ibmasm-smp 100 % done 3/6
gm-smp 100 % done 4/6 
Completing update for ibmasm  - 5/6
Completing update for gm  - 6/6
Installed:  ibmasm-smp 1:2.02-2.4.21.15.0.3.EL.2usc.19usc.i686 gm-smp
1:2.0.12.20040520-2.4.21.15.0.3.EL.2usc.23usc.i686                    
Updated:  ibmasm 1:2.02-2.4.21.15.0.3.EL.2usc.19usc.i386 gm
1:2.0.12.20040520-2.4.21.15.0.3.EL.2usc.23usc.i686
Transaction(s) Complete

I'm confused!!

-- 
Garrick Staples, Linux/HPCC Administrator
University of Southern California
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/yum/attachments/20040727/c9cbf643/attachment.bin

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux