but you never answer anyone's questions! you come on the list, purporting to ask for help, and when people try to point out additional information that they would need, or places that you could go for help, you whip out your middle finger. at least 3 people told you to add fedora.us to your conf, and you never, ever responded to that. instead you used the list as a forum to voice your unqualified opinion about a mixed group of developers not one of whom have you ever met. it would seem to me that you are the bitch. in the future, you might want to try being a little nicer to people who's only fault is to point out that you cant read. alan On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, TheFinn wrote: > I really try not to judge, but: > They're a bunch of bitches. The Mob. Nothing more. I'm sure everyone is > quite amused with everyone else. Such is the way of the mob. I shall not > send email to the list again. Bitches often volunteer for such groups - > noone else will have them. > > Quote from a review of Anarchist in the Library: > The other theme that runs throughout the book is that of cynicism. Here Siva > contrasts the civically engaged cynicism of the Greek philosopher Diogenes > of Sinope, with the narcissistic cynicism of Seinfeld's George Costanza. Why > cynicism? In Siva's words, "What could be a more ideal environment for a > cynic than cyberspace...?" The question, however, is whether and how we can > promote the responsible and humane cynicism of Diogenes vs. the shallow, > rude and selfish cynicism of Costanza. Of course, it sort of depends on how > you define rude. To make a point, Diogenes once masturbated in the market > square. Says Siva, with tongue in cheek but also a valid point, "And nothing > represents the overall nature and substance of the Internet better than > masturbating in the marketplace." > > I'm not sure why, but it definately fits. > > You guys turned a simple question into a complete show. Congrats! > > TheFinn. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "m. allan noah" <anoah@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "TheFinn" <thefinn@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 4:42 AM > Subject: Re: [Yum] hmmm my yum ate my computer. > > > > come on, man. give it a rest. this is a project with a bunch of volunteers > > giving up their weekends and evenings so that you dont have to manually > > download and compile every piece of software you want to run. (have you > > been around long enough to use wgs flagship or slack?) > > > > what ate your computer was NOT yum. it was YOU putting > > untrusted/incorrectly specified repositories in your conf. if you knew > > enough to go screwing around with that, then you better know enough to do > > it right, and or clean up after yourself. prefferably while acting civil > > in public. > > > > allan > > > > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, TheFinn wrote: > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Michael Stenner" <mstenner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > To: "Yellowdog Updater, Modified" <yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 2:25 AM > > > Subject: Re: [Yum] hmmm my yum ate my computer. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 02:03:57AM +1000, TheFinn wrote: > > > > > Let me quote from https://lists.linux.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum > > > > > "A list for the discussion of the Yum rpm updater." > > > > > > > > > Wait, that's probably not enough. Here I'll list the config file at > the > > > end > > > > > as well, as anyone who wasn't too sure and REALLY wished to be > > > constructive > > > > > would've asked for. > > > > > > > > > Please, unless someone has something constructive to say. Kindly > SHUT > > > THE > > > > > FUCK UP - you have nothing to offer. > > > > > > > > OK. Lets all calm down a bit. I will attempt to be constructive. > > > > Incidentally, it seems to me that several others HAVE attempted to > > > > help you despite your continued abuse. > > > > > > > > 1) yum can only work with packages that it finds in repositories. > > > > > > Yes, this is the point I find completely useless as everyone is subject > to > > > the whims of those who update the respositories. My problem wasn't with > yum > > > except with regards to the concept itself. > > > > > > > 2) yum can only manage dependencies based on the metadata in those > > > > packages > > > > > > Same response as point 1. > > > > > > I have better things to do and run around looking for rpms to satisfy > > > dependancies of packages that someone puts in a repository without said > > > dependancies. > > > > > > Thanks for trying to be constructive guys. > > > > > > A good thing that in 10 years time packages like this will make bitches > like > > > you - redundant. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > TF. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Yum mailing list > > > Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum > > > > > > > -- > > "so don't tell us it can't be done, putting down what you don't know. > > money isn't our god, integrity will free our souls" - Max Cavalera > > > > > > What a complete fucking moron. > > > > -- > > [ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ] > > [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] > > > > > > -- "so don't tell us it can't be done, putting down what you don't know. money isn't our god, integrity will free our souls" - Max Cavalera
