On Sun, 2004-07-18 at 20:58 +0200, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> Since I observed a considerable memory usage (about 200M) beside noticable
> runtime requirements, I decided to give the CVS version a try, but found the
> HEAD branch in a - ahem - quite inconsistent state. (Makefile.in's, reference
> of removed modules, etc..) Is that to be expected?
Yes. Seth is actively working on the HEAD branch, and it is currently in
a non-installable mode, to my knowledge.
> Should I detail my findings, provide patches, whatever?
Seth is probably already aware of the situation, but I'm sure he won't
mind patches, as long as they land in the bugzilla. :)
Regards,
--
Konstantin ("Icon") Riabitsev
Duke University Physics Sysadmin
