On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 14:07 -0500, Scott Lawrence wrote: > On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 16:52 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > > The header files express whatever deps are in the rpm. > > > > However, you might want to run this command: > > > > rpm -Va --nofiles --nomd5 > > > > see if it spits out that there are dependency problems. > > > > If there are not any problems then rpm is satisfied that all deps are > > taken care of. > > Thanks - didn't know about that one. In fact, when I ran the above, it > found another lower level dependency that had not been satisfied: > > Is there a reference somewhere on how to sort out this kind of > dependency problems within rpms? a reference? Not really. What's the unresovled dep? -sv
