[Yum] Possiable dependancy unresolution...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Woops, I forgot that this was on one of my test boxes!!! Now why was I running 
yum-2 on this...? Hrmm, pick one (your guess is as good as mine):

   I have absolutely no recollection of this!
   It was like that when I got here.
   I thought your SPEC requires tag was a typo.
   Just testing...

Sorry for raising the alarms,... Don't kill (me too much :)!

On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 04:36:26PM -0400, seth vidal told me:
> 
> NO NO NO NO,
> 
> not a bug.
> 
> I found it.
> 
> you're using rhl 8.0.
> 
> with rpm 4.1-1.06, right?
> 
> that's not the right version for yum 2.0.2.
> 
> rpm 4.1.1 not 4.1-1 for yum 2.0.2.
> 
> rpm 4.1-1.06 didn't handle the ts.addInstall(hdr, 'a') mode at all - so
> no deps will ever resolve with that.
> 
> in fact I thought the spec file for yum 2.x required rpm >= 4.1.1
> 
> -sv
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Yum mailing list
> Yum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum

-- 
Greg M. Kurtzer, CSE: Linux cluster specialist
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Contact: O=510.495.2307, P=510.448.4540, M=510.928.9953
1 Cyclotron Road #90-1116, Berkeley, CA 94720
http://www.lbl.gov, http://scs.lbl.gov/, http://lug.lbl.gov/
Email: GMKurtzer_at_lbl.gov, Text: 5109289953_at_mobileatt.net

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux