On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:53:44AM -0800, Klingaman, Aaron L wrote: > Yeah, as a matter of fact, the project I'm working on already has the > pycurl and curl rpms, so for me at least dependencies aren't an issue. > I'm primarily interested in pycurl/curl because I've used it in the > past. Yeah, that makes sense. Some of the people who have expressed interest in urlgrabber would not be excited about requiring pycurl/curl. Otherwise, it looks pretty slick. > I missed the conversation on the next version of urlgrabber. Do you have > any kind of time frame for pyOpenSSL support? You can check the archives for some of the discussion. It went off-list due to apparent lack of interest from the masses. The ever-evolving design document is located at the urlgrabber site. I would welcome other input. http://linux.duke.edu/projects/mini/urlgrabber/DESIGN Time frame? Probably in the next month or two, but who knows, I've got this pesky thesis thing to deal with as well :) -Michael -- Michael Stenner Office Phone: 919-660-2513 Duke University, Dept. of Physics mstenner@xxxxxxxxxxxx Box 90305, Durham N.C. 27708-0305
