i noticed, in rgb's new draft, updated terminology for the terms "server" and "repository", which seems to be more in line with what most folks would assume: server: a physical system (which could, of course, contain multiple independent repositories) repository: a yum-arch'ed collection of RPMs -- essentially, a directory reference but the next term, "serverid", seems out of place. from what i read, it defines a possibly redundant set of repositories that are meant to mirror/backup one another. would it not be more appropriate to refer to this as a "repositoryid"? since it seems that a single (physical) server might contain more than one of these *sets* of repositories, right? or did i misread this? rday, p.s. i'm assuming that what we're talking about in terms of a "serverid"/"repositoryid" is a label that would say something like "fedora core 1.0", which would completely identify the version of the RPMs contained therein, right?
