On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, seth vidal wrote: > On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 18:28, Satish Balay wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, Satish Balay wrote: > > > > > > > > Wit the additional info - I might decide - this time will update the > > > gpgckecked packages (explicitly) - and ignore the others (provided it > > > works) > > > > > > yum update pkg1 pkg2 ..... > > > > Thinking about it further - this could be the default behavior.. Yum > > could update the packages that have the proper gpg signature (provided > > it works i.e rpm dependencies) - and give a message: > > absolutely not. > > a transaction is a single operation. Either it all succeeds the checks > or nothing gets run. I think it is still a transaction - and a useful one to have. You can call it a different name/option if it makes it consistant. Currently you have update, upgrade transactions. This can be update-pgp or something like that.. Satish
