On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 17:16, jcosta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > Actually, I'm more concerned about Red Hat's agreement, not the GPL. > > Does RH restrict you in any legal way from using Yum? Does RH impose any > legal roadblocks on NOT using up2date to keep your system updated? > > Red Hat's license allows them to "audit" you at their discretion; I want to > ensure that by using YUM, we're not violating anything... > > You're not. There are people on this list using yum with RHAS 2.1 - they are not violating their agreement provided they are not redistributing the patches to their system to other, unlicensed systems. -sv