On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 11:07, Garrick Staples wrote: > On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 08:36:47AM -0500, seth vidal alleged: > > You're right. But I'm not sure if there is a way to implement 'go back > > and forth b/t noarch and any other compatible arch even when exactarch=1 > > is set' w/o making the code god-awful in that section. > > Maybe exactarch could be ignored during an 'upgrade', but honored during > an 'update'. Or, print a warning when exactarch is preventing a match > when no other matches are available. Ignoring things simply based on the mode is a bad bad bad bad idea. It means unknown reactions. Additionally I think 'upgrade' mode is going away entirely. something like yum --with-obsoletes update will occur. -sv
