[Yum] Re: Check conflicts; multiple archs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--JP+T4n/bALQSJXh8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 08:53:56PM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 19:45, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > I managed to get yum 1.8-20030307 running on RH8.0/rpm 4.2/python 2.2.1=
 (the
> > bug with httplib was easy to fix by reducing the arguments, the other w=
ith
> > coflicting epochs/versions I simply deleted the older package).
> >=20
>=20
> huh? The older pkg is just ignored in that case - the error you
> encountered was the following:
>=20
> a request for the strings which represent the version information
> resulted in one of the strings returning an int not an string or None -
> that isn't an "old pkg" paackage problem.

I know, I deleted the old package to move past that point. This wasn't a
fix. ;)

> > The conflicting errors puzzle me. How can glibc conflict with glibc-com=
mon?
> > And docbook-dtds conflicts with openjade only if openjade!=3D1.3.1.
>=20
> Which distro ver is this? I just ran a yum-arch -l -c -vv on phoebe+some
> rawhide and I don't get this problem.

plain Red Hat 8.0 without updates.
--=20
Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--JP+T4n/bALQSJXh8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+e8PnQBVS1GOamfERAkMTAJkB/g9eYVfwtyppsfyogLffjizR2QCeOjz4
9M1/emiT9dej34Gbo6BSv2A=
=U2LM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--JP+T4n/bALQSJXh8--


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux