> On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 08:43, Smith, Eric V. wrote: > > > I dunno about going on - It could potentially make for a dangerous > > > situation on the client-side. Consider if it missed an=20 > > > important update > > > that caused a lot of other things to fail to update. I=20 > think exiting > > > with a more graceful error makes a lot more sense than=20 > continuing and > > > ignoring the problem. > >=20 > > I agree. I've had situations where a single file got=20 > corrupted while > > downloading (usually 0 length). I'd rather see an error message. >=20 >=20 > So you want it to error w/ a sensible error message then exit? Yes. Sorry for not being clear. Eric.
