On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 08:43, Smith, Eric V. wrote: > > I dunno about going on - It could potentially make for a dangerous > > situation on the client-side. Consider if it missed an > > important update > > that caused a lot of other things to fail to update. I think exiting > > with a more graceful error makes a lot more sense than continuing and > > ignoring the problem. > > I agree. I've had situations where a single file got corrupted while > downloading (usually 0 length). I'd rather see an error message. So you want it to error w/ a sensible error message then exit? -sv
