On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 11:42, Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote: > On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 10:33:59AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > Keep in mind - juggling dependencies for a single system and single > > database is hard enough. Doing it for 2 gets dramatically harder and > > relocatable binaries are difficult to make on their best day. > > On a related topic, has anyone found a compelling paradigm for splitting > an install between a local filesystem and remote (NFS) server(s)? > > Someday we will have union-mount & unionfs (*) and the relocate v. > symlink-farm headache can go away. But the multiple-database / > dependency-mgmt hell remains. Not with disks as big as they are these days and as cheap. push it ALL on the local disk and be done with it. -sv
