GitLab proposal wiki page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,
   So, The GitLab hosting project has been scrubbed and replaced with
packaging. What about the GSOC submission? Anyways , the change is not the
issue. A few days back Vit sent me links about packaging[1][2], I have
already started on it . But then still , how would the change in project
idea affect my evaluation , as I understand it changes the whole proposal
idea so should I change my proposal accordingly and am I allowed to do so
now?

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby


On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 4 May 2013 23:59:41 +0530
> Mrigesh Pokhrel <mrigeshpokhrel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >     I have made my Proposal wiki page[1] for your reference , do
> > comment and review it and help me in improving it as required.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2013/Student_Application_rag3nix/Gitlib
> >
> > IRC : rag3nix , rag3
>
> So, this idea has changed a lot since it was on the idea page.
>
> Basically the current thing that needs doing is packaging gitlab and
> all it's vast dependencies into Fedora/EPEL. This will allow anyone
> interested in running it to simply yum install it and go, which will be
> great. :)
>
> This would allow us down the road to deploy one in Fedora
> Infrastructure if it meets our needs. (and it would use the normal RFR
> process at:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Request_For_Resources?rd=Infrastructure/RFR
> )
> See discussion on the infrastructure list about how gitlab may or may
> not meet our needs (mostly around how they handle public repos).
> Additionally, if we do decide to setup gitlab, I think it very likely
> we would NOT move all our hosted projects to it, but instead allow it
> as a opt-in or additional resource (possibly even allowing anyone with
> a fedora account to just make their own projects there).
>
> So, I would suggest you re-work your proposal as packging it up (or
> choose another one if you are not interested in packaging).
>
> I've reworked the suggestions page:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Summer_coding_ideas_for_2013&diff=prev&oldid=335470
> to better reflect this.
>
> Sorry for the confusion.
>
> kevin
>



-- 
Thanks and Regards
Mrigesh Pokhrel
+91 9807585021
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/summer-coding/attachments/20130505/863f847c/attachment.html>

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux