Hi Lijiang,
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 6:37 PM lijiang <lijiang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi, Tao
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 2:24 PM lijiang <lijiang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 1:55 PM Tao Liu <ltao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Aditya & Lianbo,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 11:46 PM Aditya Gupta <adityag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hello Lianbo,
>>> >
>>> > On 24/06/24 05:32PM, lijiang wrote:
>>> > > > <...snip...>
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Before:
>>> > > > crash> gdb bt
>>> > > > #0 0xffffffff816a8f65 in context_switch ...
>>> > > > #1 __schedule () ...
>>> > > > #2 0xffffffff816a94e9 in schedule ...
>>> > > > #3 0xffffffff816a86fd in schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock ...
>>> > > > #4 0xffffffff816a8733 in schedule_hrtimeout_range ...
>>> > > > #5 0xffffffff8124bb7e in ep_poll ...
>>> > > > #6 0xffffffff8124d00d in SYSC_epoll_wait ...
>>> > > > #7 SyS_epoll_wait ...
>>> > > > #8 <signal handler called>
>>> > > > #9 0x00007f0449407923 in ?? ()
>>> > > > #10 0xffff880100000001 in ?? ()
>>> > > > #11 0xffff880169b3c010 in ?? ()
>>> > > > #12 0x0000000000000040 in irq_stack_union ()
>>> > > > #13 0xffff880169b3c058 in ?? ()
>>> > > > #14 0xffff880169b3c048 in ?? ()
>>> > > > #15 0xffff880169b3c050 in ?? ()
>>> > > > #16 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>>> > > >
>>> > > > After:
>>> > > > crash> gdb bt
>>> > > > #0 0xffffffff816a8f65 in context_switch ...
>>> > > > #1 __schedule () ...
>>> > > > #2 0xffffffff816a94e9 in schedule () ...
>>> > > > #3 0xffffffff816a86fd in schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock ...
>>> > > > #4 0xffffffff816a8733 in schedule_hrtimeout_range ...
>>> > > > #5 0xffffffff8124bb7e in ep_poll ...
>>> > > > #6 0xffffffff8124d00d in SYSC_epoll_wait ...
>>> > > > #7 SyS_epoll_wait ...
>>> > > > #8 <signal handler called>
>>> > > > #9 0x00007f0449407923 in ?? ()
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > It seems that there are still some non-kernel addresses that do not get
>>> > > filtered. Can you help double check?
>>>
>>> Yes, it is a non-kernel address which does not get filtered.
>>>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > For example:
>>> > >
>>> > > crash> gdb bt
>>> > > #0 crash_setup_regs (newregs=0xffffb5bb4f197938, oldregs=0x0) at
>>> > > ./arch/x86/include/asm/kexec.h:114
>>> > > #1 0xffffffff8e61e32e in __crash_kexec (regs=regs@entry=0x0) at
>>> > > kernel/crash_core.c:122
>>> > > #2 0xffffffff8e51a64d in panic (fmt=fmt@entry=0xffffffff8fa51609 "sysrq
>>> > > triggered crash\n") at kernel/panic.c:366
>>> > > #3 0xffffffff8ec21f86 in sysrq_handle_crash (key=<optimized out>) at
>>> > > drivers/tty/sysrq.c:154
>>> > > #4 0xffffffff8ec22550 in __handle_sysrq (key=<optimized out>,
>>> > > check_mask=check_mask@entry=false) at drivers/tty/sysrq.c:612
>>> > > #5 0xffffffff8ec22bf5 in write_sysrq_trigger (file=<optimized out>,
>>> > > buf=<optimized out>, count=2, ppos=<optimized out>) at
>>> > > drivers/tty/sysrq.c:1183
>>> > > #6 0xffffffff8e935ae5 in pde_write (ppos=<optimized out>, count=<optimized
>>> > > out>, buf=<optimized out>, file=0xffffb5bb4f197938, pde=0xffff98338b78e0c0)
>>> > > at fs/proc/inode.c:334
>>> > > #7 proc_reg_write (file=0xffffb5bb4f197938, buf=0x0, count=1, ppos=0x0) at
>>> > > fs/proc/inode.c:346
>>> > > #8 0xffffffff8e88d382 in vfs_write (file=file@entry=0xffff98338b789200,
>>> > > buf=buf@entry=0x5614d58a22c0 <error: Cannot access memory at address
>>> > > 0x5614d58a22c0>, count=count@entry=2, pos=pos@entry=0xffffb5bb4f197b78) at
>>> > > fs/read_write.c:588
>>> > > #9 0xffffffff8e88d9ff in ksys_write (fd=<optimized out>,
>>> > > buf=0x5614d58a22c0 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x5614d58a22c0>,
>>> > > count=2) at fs/read_write.c:643
>>> > > #10 0xffffffff8f124429 in do_syscall_x64 (nr=1, regs=0xffffb5bb4f197f58) at
>>> > > arch/x86/entry/common.c:52
>>> > > #11 do_syscall_64 (regs=0xffffb5bb4f197f58, nr=1) at
>>> > > arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
>>> > > #12 0xffffffff8f20012b in entry_SYSCALL_64 () at
>>> > > arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121
>>> > > #13 0x00007f9a147f69e0 in ?? ()
>>> > >
>>> > > The frame #13 looks like a non-kernel address.
>>>
>>> The address usually to be the user space address before entering
>>> kernel, you can see it by:
>>>
>>> crash> gdb bt
>>> ...snip...
>>> #7 SyS_epoll_wait ...
>>> #8 <signal handler called>
>>> #9 0x00007f0449407923 in ?? ()
>>>
>>> crash> bt
>>> ...snip...
>>> #6 [ffff880169b3bf80] system_call_fastpath at ffffffff816b5009
>>> RIP: 00007f0449407923 ...
>>>
>>> So I think leaving the last frame here is useful and shouldn't be
>>> filtered. Though it looks like some garbage data, it can help for some
>>> experienced users...
>>
>>
>>
>> Hmm, normally it should be filtered, otherwise this looks weird.
>>
>> Let me dig into the details and see if that can be filtered out.
>
>
Thanks for your patch!
> Can you help try this? I saw the non-kernel addresses are filtered out.
>
> + #ifdef CRASH_MERGE
> + extern "C" int is_kvaddr(ulong);
> + #endif
>
> static void
> print_frame (const frame_print_options &fp_opts,
> frame_info *frame, int print_level,
> enum print_what print_what, int print_args,
> struct symtab_and_line sal)
> {
> struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (frame);
> struct ui_out *uiout = current_uiout;
> enum language funlang = language_unknown;
> struct value_print_options opts;
> struct symbol *func;
> CORE_ADDR pc = 0;
> int pc_p;
>
> pc_p = get_frame_pc_if_available (frame, &pc);
> + #ifdef CRASH_MERGE
> + if (!is_kvaddr(pc))
> + return;
> + #endif
> ...
> }
Your code change is "stop printing for non-kernel address", however I
would prefer to "stop stack unwinding for non-kernel address", so I
think it is better to modify it within the for loop, this is where
stack unwinding happens.
for (fi = trailing; fi && count--; fi = get_prev_frame (fi))
...
print_frame_info (fp_opts, fi, 1, LOCATION, 1, 0);
I made the following code change:
for (fi = trailing; fi && count--; fi = get_prev_frame (fi))
{
QUIT;
...
+ CORE_ADDR pc = 0;
+ get_frame_pc_if_available (fi, &pc);
+ if (!is_kvaddr(pc)) {
+ fi = NULL;
+ break;
+ }
print_frame_info (fp_opts, fi, 1, LOCATION, 1, 0);
With the change:
crash> gdb bt
#0 blk_mq_rq_timed_out (req=0xffff880fdb246000,
reserved=reserved@entry=false) at block/blk-mq.c:640
#1 0xffffffff8130504c in blk_mq_check_expired
(hctx=hctx@entry=0xffff880fda56bc00, rq=<optimized out>,
priv=priv@entry=0xffff880fcf68fde8, reserved=reserved@entry=false) at
block/blk-mq.c:697
#2 0xffffffff81305eb4 in bt_for_each
(hctx=hctx@entry=0xffff880fda56bc00, bt=bt@entry=0xffff88014c14c310,
off=32, fn=fn@entry=0xffffffff81304ff0 <blk_mq_check_expired>,
data=data@entry=0xffff880fcf68fde8, reserved=reserved@entry=false) at
block/blk-mq-tag.c:431
#3 0xffffffff8130686e in blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter
(q=q@entry=0xffff88004912a340, fn=fn@entry=0xffffffff81304ff0
<blk_mq_check_expired>, priv=priv@entry=0xffff880fcf68fde8) at
block/blk-mq-tag.c:530
#4 0xffffffff81301d2b in blk_mq_timeout_work
(work=0xffff88004912ab68) at block/blk-mq.c:730
#5 0xffffffff810a881a in process_one_work
(worker=worker@entry=0xffff880fd86efa00, work=0xffff88004912ab68) at
kernel/workqueue.c:2252
#6 0xffffffff810a94e6 in worker_thread (__worker=0xffff880fd86efa00)
at kernel/workqueue.c:2380
#7 0xffffffff810b098f in kthread (_create=0xffff8801695f7d38) at
kernel/kthread.c:202
#8 <signal handler called>
crash>
What do you think?
Thanks,
Tao Liu
>
> Thanks
> Lianbo
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Lianbo
>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> > True. Though it seems to be okay for it to print the last frame with a
>>> > non-kernel address, as in this snippet from gdb:
>>> >
>>> > for (fi = trailing; fi && count--; fi = get_prev_frame (fi))
>>> > ...
>>> > print_frame_info (fp_opts, fi, 1, LOCATION, 1, 0);
>>> >
>>> > Seems that frame #13, fi was not NULL.
>>> >
>>> > Seeing Tao's change, it compares the current frame's NIP/PC to see if
>>> > it should return NULL (which I think is nice and works). Here the
>>> > 'this_frame' would have been frame 12, (which would have called
>>> > `'get_prev_frame' to get the frame 13)
>>> >
>>> > ```
>>> > frame_pc_p = get_frame_pc_if_available (this_frame, &frame_pc);
>>> > #ifdef CRASH_MERGE
>>> > if (!is_kvaddr(frame_pc)) {
>>> > return NULL;
>>> > }
>>> > #endif
>>> > ```
>>> >
>>> > Tao's condition will hit when 'get_prev_frame(this_frame=frame#13)' will
>>> > be called to get the frame #14, which will return NULL and hence break
>>> > out of the loop.
>>> >
>>> > This is based on what I recall and a quick look at the implementation,
>>> > please feel free to correct Lianbo/Tao.
>>>
>>> Thanks Aditya for the detailed inspection, which I didn't dive into.
>>> When I notice the last frame to be the userspace address, I just keep
>>> it as it is.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Tao Liu
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Aditya Gupta
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks
>>> > > Lianbo
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > > Cc: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > > > Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > > > Cc: Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > > > Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > > > Cc: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > > > Cc: HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) <k-hagio-ab@xxxxxxx>
>>> > > > Cc: Tao Liu <ltao@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > > > Cc: Alexey Makhalov <alexey.makhalov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > > > Signed-off-by: Tao Liu <ltao@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > > > ---
>>> > > > defs.h | 1 +
>>> > > > gdb-10.2.patch | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> > > > gdb_interface.c | 6 ++++++
>>> > > > 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
>>> > > >
>>> > > > diff --git a/defs.h b/defs.h
>>> > > > index 012ffdc..c0e6a29 100644
>>> > > > --- a/defs.h
>>> > > > +++ b/defs.h
>>> > > > @@ -7902,6 +7902,7 @@ extern unsigned char *gdb_prettyprint_arrays;
>>> > > > extern unsigned int *gdb_repeat_count_threshold;
>>> > > > extern unsigned char *gdb_stop_print_at_null;
>>> > > > extern unsigned int *gdb_output_radix;
>>> > > > +int is_kvaddr(ulong);
>>> > > >
>>> > > > /*
>>> > > > * gdb/top.c
>>> > > > diff --git a/gdb-10.2.patch b/gdb-10.2.patch
>>> > > > index 0bed96a..3ed40c0 100644
>>> > > > --- a/gdb-10.2.patch
>>> > > > +++ b/gdb-10.2.patch
>>> > > > @@ -16171,3 +16171,29 @@ exit 0
>>> > > > }
>>> > > >
>>> > > > /*
>>> > > > +--- gdb-10.2/gdb/frame.c.orig
>>> > > > ++++ gdb-10.2/gdb/frame.c
>>> > > > +@@ -2331,6 +2331,10 @@ inside_entry_func (frame_info *this_frame)
>>> > > > + This function should not contain target-dependent tests, such as
>>> > > > + checking whether the program-counter is zero. */
>>> > > > +
>>> > > > ++#ifdef CRASH_MERGE
>>> > > > ++extern "C" int is_kvaddr(ulong);
>>> > > > ++#endif
>>> > > > ++
>>> > > > + struct frame_info *
>>> > > > + get_prev_frame (struct frame_info *this_frame)
>>> > > > + {
>>> > > > +@@ -2353,7 +2357,11 @@ get_prev_frame (struct frame_info *this_frame)
>>> > > > + get_frame_id (this_frame);
>>> > > > +
>>> > > > + frame_pc_p = get_frame_pc_if_available (this_frame, &frame_pc);
>>> > > > +-
>>> > > > ++#ifdef CRASH_MERGE
>>> > > > ++ if (!is_kvaddr(frame_pc)) {
>>> > > > ++ return NULL;
>>> > > > ++ }
>>> > > > ++#endif
>>> > > > + /* tausq/2004-12-07: Dummy frames are skipped because it doesn't make
>>> > > > much
>>> > > > + sense to stop unwinding at a dummy frame. One place where a dummy
>>> > > > + frame may have an address "inside_main_func" is on HPUX. On HPUX,
>>> > > > the
>>> > > > diff --git a/gdb_interface.c b/gdb_interface.c
>>> > > > index b13d5fd..e76ecc6 100644
>>> > > > --- a/gdb_interface.c
>>> > > > +++ b/gdb_interface.c
>>> > > > @@ -947,6 +947,12 @@ gdb_lookup_module_symbol(ulong addr, ulong *offset)
>>> > > > }
>>> > > > }
>>> > > >
>>> > > > +int
>>> > > > +is_kvaddr(ulong addr)
>>> > > > +{
>>> > > > + return IS_KVADDR(addr);
>>> > > > +}
>>> > > > +
>>> > > > /*
>>> > > > * Used by gdb_interface() to catch gdb-related errors, if desired.
>>> > > > */
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > 2.40.1
>>> > > >
>>> >
>>>
--
Crash-utility mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://${domain_name}/admin/lists/devel.lists.crash-utility.osci.io/
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki
