On 2024/01/16 17:23, Lianbo Jiang wrote:
> On 1/16/24 16:11, HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) wrote:
>
>> On 2024/01/15 16:58, Lianbo Jiang wrote:
>>
>>>> --- a/x86_64.c
>>>> +++ b/x86_64.c
>>>> @@ -3342,6 +3342,13 @@ x86_64_print_stack_entry(struct bt_info *bt,
>>>> FILE
>>>> *ofp, int level,
>>>>
>>>> bt->call_target = name;
>>>>
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * The caller check below does not work correctly for some
>>>> + * kernels, so skip it if ORC unwidner is available.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (machdep->flags & ORC)
>>>> + return result;
>>>> +
>>>> if (is_direct_call_target(bt)) {
>>>> if (CRASHDEBUG(2))
>>>> fprintf(ofp, "< enable BT_CHECK_CALLER for
>>>> %s >\n",
>>>>
>>>> Could I have the output of "bt 493113" after "set debug 2" with this?
>>>> (An attached text file is better for logs.)
>>> Sure. Please check the crash_bt_493113.txt.
>> Thanks, the call trace looks correct.
> Thank you for the confirmation, Kazu.
>> I've updated the patch at my end, is the attached ok for you?
>
> This change looks good to me in this case. But the reporter is: Crystal
> Wood <crwood@xxxxxxxxxx>, not me. :-)
Thank you for checking and the information, applied with the change.
https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/commit/aed1b7d3a064
Thanks,
Kazu
--
Crash-utility mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://${domain_name}/admin/lists/devel.lists.crash-utility.osci.io/
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki
