On 1/16/24 16:11, HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) wrote:
On 2024/01/15 16:58, Lianbo Jiang wrote:
--- a/x86_64.c
+++ b/x86_64.c
@@ -3342,6 +3342,13 @@ x86_64_print_stack_entry(struct bt_info *bt, FILE
*ofp, int level,
bt->call_target = name;
+ /*
+ * The caller check below does not work correctly for some
+ * kernels, so skip it if ORC unwidner is available.
+ */
+ if (machdep->flags & ORC)
+ return result;
+
if (is_direct_call_target(bt)) {
if (CRASHDEBUG(2))
fprintf(ofp, "< enable BT_CHECK_CALLER for
%s >\n",
Could I have the output of "bt 493113" after "set debug 2" with this?
(An attached text file is better for logs.)
Sure. Please check the crash_bt_493113.txt.
Thanks, the call trace looks correct.
Thank you for the confirmation, Kazu.
I've updated the patch at my end, is the attached ok for you?
This change looks good to me in this case. But the reporter is: Crystal
Wood <crwood@xxxxxxxxxx>, not me. :-)
Thanks
Lianbo
Thanks,
Kazu
--
Crash-utility mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://${domain_name}/admin/lists/devel.lists.crash-utility.osci.io/
Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki
