On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:25:44 -0400 (EDT) Dave Anderson <anderson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>>> but nonetheless, it does seem that Steve's patch > > >>>> to the trace.c module is the better course of action. Does it work OK > > >>>> for you? > > > > Yes Steve's patch fixes trace segfault for me. > > Ok good, thanks. > > I've cc'd this to the maintainer -- Xu, can you please review the patchset? BTW, I tried to subscribe to the crash-utility discussion list, with no response. I'd like to take a more active role in helping to maintain the trace.so extension as I'm the one that will be breaking it in the future ;-) Also, I now have a team working on trace-cmd and the trace.dat file will be getting more features that crash may want to take advantage of. -- Steve -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
