----- Original Message ----- > On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 16:23 -0600, Bob Montgomery wrote: > > If you change the > > fprintf(pc->saved_fp, buf); > > lines to > > print_verbatim(pc->saved_fp, buf); > > > > Then I won't get: > > > > crash> sk_buff.head ffff88012014dc80 > > Segmentation fault > > > > When I need to get: > > > > crash> sk_buff.head ffff88012014dc80 > > head = 0xffff880121267000 "\"%s %s %s\", got type \"%s\"" > > > > > > Patch attached (6.0.8). > > > > I suspect performance will suffer a bit when I try to print > > 2 million of these... > > Wonder if it would be quicker on average to string search for "%" and > conditionally call print_verbatim??? I had lots of successful > fprintf's and only a small number of seg viol cases. > > Bob M. Hi Bob, Although in practice, (1) parse_for_member() is rarely called "in quantity", and (2) when it is called, it would only encounter this with "char *" members, and (3) the string would also have to have a '%' in it. On the other hand, if you test the two print-types with a million calls, there's a significant performance hit. But if a strstr() is done first on the string, there's virtually no hit at all if there's no '%' in it. So yes, I agree with you that the string-search/conditional call should be done. I'll add that to your patch, and queue it for crash-6.0.9. Thanks, Dave -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
