On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 16:23 -0600, Bob Montgomery wrote: > If you change the > fprintf(pc->saved_fp, buf); > lines to > print_verbatim(pc->saved_fp, buf); > > Then I won't get: > > crash> sk_buff.head ffff88012014dc80 > Segmentation fault > > When I need to get: > > crash> sk_buff.head ffff88012014dc80 > head = 0xffff880121267000 "\"%s %s %s\", got type \"%s\"" > > > Patch attached (6.0.8). > > I suspect performance will suffer a bit when I try to print > 2 million of these... Wonder if it would be quicker on average to string search for "%" and conditionally call print_verbatim??? I had lots of successful fprintf's and only a small number of seg viol cases. Bob M. -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
