----- Original Message ----- > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 00:13 +0000, Montgomery, Bob wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 21:59 +0000, Dave Anderson wrote: > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 15:18 +0000, Dave Anderson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > While testing my search patch, I kicked off an unconstrained physical > > > > > > search on a live session and hung the machine so thoroughly that it > > > > > > required a visit to the machine room to physically unplug it to get the > > > > > > remote console back up. Coincidence? Or should physical address search > > > > > > on a live session be constrained somehow for safety? > > > > > I'm guessing that's bad :-) I'll implement the rejector code in the > > physical search, and see if I can avoid a trip to the machine room. > > Something like this? It seems to be surviving physical searches on my > live session now. Any reason this would thwart the purpose of the > physical search in any way? "But I wanted to search pci space..." Nah -- it's meant for physical memory only. Queued for version 5.1.3. Thanks, Dave -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
