----- "Bernhard Walle" <bwalle@xxxxxxx> wrote: > * Dave Anderson [2008-08-26 09:03]: > > > > Tests fine, although the "unknown+offset" output is a bit > confusing: > > > > crash> test > > > > test: invalid structure member offset: task_struct_next_run > > FILE: test.c LINE: 23 FUNCTION: test_global() > > > > [/tmp/crash] error trace: 80fd683 => 80fd71b => 80fd5d7 => > 813e6ec > > > > 813e6ec: OFFSET_verify+126 > > 80fd5d7: test_global+51 > > 80fd71b: unknown+145 > > 80fd683: cmd_test+137 > > > > test: invalid structure member offset: task_struct_next_run > > FILE: test.c LINE: 23 FUNCTION: test_global() > > > > crash> > > > > I'm thinking maybe an "(undetermined)" string would be clearer. > > Ok for me. Should I resend a patch or do you modify that on your > side? > I guess you disagree with coding style anyway. ;-) Nah, it's all set -- thanks again... Dave -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
