* Dave Anderson [2008-08-26 09:03]: > > Tests fine, although the "unknown+offset" output is a bit confusing: > > crash> test > > test: invalid structure member offset: task_struct_next_run > FILE: test.c LINE: 23 FUNCTION: test_global() > > [/tmp/crash] error trace: 80fd683 => 80fd71b => 80fd5d7 => 813e6ec > > 813e6ec: OFFSET_verify+126 > 80fd5d7: test_global+51 > 80fd71b: unknown+145 > 80fd683: cmd_test+137 > > test: invalid structure member offset: task_struct_next_run > FILE: test.c LINE: 23 FUNCTION: test_global() > > crash> > > I'm thinking maybe an "(undetermined)" string would be clearer. Ok for me. Should I resend a patch or do you modify that on your side? I guess you disagree with coding style anyway. ;-) Bernhard -- Bernhard Walle, SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Architecture Development -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
