What seems so simple... I note that when looking at stripped versions when any of the backtrace'd functions are static (type 't') and therefore not in the symbol list, the backtrace will find and use the closest-but-less-than symbol value, thereby giving a completely bogus symbol translation. I'm not sure what's worse -- not doing the translation at all or showing potentially bogus entries. Dave -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
