----- "Bernhard Walle" <bwalle@xxxxxxx> wrote: > * Dave Anderson [2008-08-25 11:25]: > > > > It probably could be made even simpler than that if a > quick-and-dirty > > pre-examination of thisfile could be done to determine whether it's > > stripped or not? > > Well, not quick and dirty but with bfd (which we already have in > place). What do you think about that one? > Yeah, I was looking at the bfd->flags, but they are the same, so if using bfd_canonicalize_symtab() works, that seems OK. But I think I'll make it quicker and dirtier by changing the is_bfd_format(filename) function to take a second "stripped" argument, and overload the function to return the right thing depending upon whether it's set or not. And I'll probably forego the use of the nm_call and stripped_binary variables, and just make the creation of the command string a simple if-else statement... ;-) Thanks for finding and testing this. I never noticed this issue since I only use the debugful version. Dave -- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility