On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 06:42:19PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 6:25 PM David Lechner <dlechner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Do you plan to pick up the other patches that have been acked > > as well? It seems like most folks were OK with everything going > > though the gpio tree since the changes are small. > Jonathan requested a branch so I made one and sent out a PR. I figured > people would just pick the relevant patches into their respective > trees? For patches that won't be in next by rc5 - I will take them if > Acked - just remind me. If people are acking things that generally means they're expecting them to go along with the rest of the series. When you didn't apply the ASoC patch I did actually put into CI but it was a bit surprising that you seemed to be expecting that.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 00/15] gpiolib: add gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 00/15] gpiolib: add gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
- References:
- [PATCH v3 00/15] gpiolib: add gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
- From: David Lechner
- Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 00/15] gpiolib: add gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 00/15] gpiolib: add gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
- From: David Lechner
- Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 00/15] gpiolib: add gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- [PATCH v3 00/15] gpiolib: add gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies() part two
- Next by Date: Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 00/15] gpiolib: add gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
- Previous by thread: Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 00/15] gpiolib: add gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
- Next by thread: Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 00/15] gpiolib: add gpiod_multi_set_value_cansleep
- Index(es):
![]() |