Re: [PATCH 00/16] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies() part two

[Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 1/28/2025 4:16 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 18:21:45 +0000 Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> This is the second series (part 1*) that converts users of msecs_to_jiffies() that
>> either use the multiply pattern of either of:
>> - msecs_to_jiffies(N*1000) or
>> - msecs_to_jiffies(N*MSEC_PER_SEC)
>>
>> where N is a constant or an expression, to avoid the multiplication.
>>
>> The conversion is made with Coccinelle with the secs_to_jiffies() script
>> in scripts/coccinelle/misc. Attention is paid to what the best change
>> can be rather than restricting to what the tool provides.
>>
>> Andrew has kindly agreed to take the series through mm.git modulo the
>> patches maintainers want to pick through their own trees.
> 
> I added patches 2-16 to mm.git.  If any of these later get merged into
> a subsystem tree, Stephen will tell us and I'll drop the mm.git copy.

Hi Andrew, I don't see these in mm-nonmm-unstable. Did these get dropped in the confusion around
casting secs_to_jiffies() to unsigned long[1]? That has since been merged in 6.14-rc2 via tglx' tree,
and I have a v2 for just the ceph patches that needed some fixups at [2].

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250130192701.99626-1-eahariha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250203-converge-secs-to-jiffies-part-two-v2-0-d7058a01fd0e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Thanks,
Easwar (he/him)