On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 03:01:11PM +0200, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> > >>> Frank
> > >> the SOF drivers do indeed have some similarities, but each of them has their own quirks which IMO makes it a bit harder to add the 95 support. We need to figure out the common parts and then move them to imx-common, but I believe this can be solved incrementally.
> > > You should create common part firstly, then implement equal function with
> > > existed part. Finially add imx95 part.
> > >
> > > Frank
> >
> > Yes, I'm aware of how this _should_ be done, but, like I mentioned, the change is not trivial and will
> > require tweaking the other drivers as well. As such, I'd like to get the 95 support in as-is firstly.
> >
> > Are there any other thoughts on this?
>
> Laurentiu, Frank please trim the emails and keep only the relevant
> part for discussion.
>
> As for this matter I think we should go with the current version Laurentiu sent.
>
> It is inline with the implementation for imx8qxp, imx8qm, imx8mp and
> imx8ulp which we already have upstream.
>
> There is always space for refactorization and improvements. The
> current version of the code
> is simple enough to go in as it is.
Need provide enough reason in commit message show why need create new one,
and but not reused existed one, which help maintainer and reviewer to judge
if it make sense.
Frank
>
> With this,
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@xxxxxxx>
>
> thanks,
> Daniel.
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]